Harold Lloyd in “An Eastern Westerner” (1920)

Harold Lloyd - An Eastern Westerner - Pretty Clever FilmsIn the holy Chaplin-Keaton-Lloyd trinity of silent film comedians, I find Harold Lloyd the funniest. Charlie Chaplin moves me to tears with his Victorian pathos and Buster Keaton amazes me with inspiring physical acrobatics and obsessive problem solving. But it’s Harold Lloyd that makes me laugh, often out loud, and for a very long time. The Harold Lloyd character, “Glasses Guy” we’ll call him, is certainly the most relatable of the three. In Lloyd’s spunky success-driven go getter, we can see our own unfailing optimism that persistence and hard work will pay off, by gosh! But, sadly, in the ultimately disappointing An Eastern Westerner, Lloyd doesn’t quite play this well-loved  and funny character.

Lloyd, Harold - Eastern Westerner - Pretty Clever FilmsAn Eastern Westerner features a spoiled and privileged East Coast playboy who has stayed out shimmying all night one too many times for his frustrated father. As a punishment for his blase recklessness, Dad ships him off to his uncle’s ranch in the wild west. In the town of Piute Pass, a bad man named “Tiger Lips” Tompkins is holding a girl’s father hostage until she agrees to, um, submit to him. Of course, “Glasses Guy” falls in love with her and amid some classic frantic slapstick antics, save her father and wins her hand.

As this synopsis illustrates, An Eastern Westerner is a slapstick in the purest sense. The plot is less than flimsy and serves only to create the loose scenario for some sight gags and chases. It would seem to have a lot of potential for the funny dissonance of the foppish rich boy dropped into a dusty frontier town, but this doesn’t quite pan out. The East coast setup runs for nearly half of this short film’s length, leaving little time to exploit those city boy in the country comic possibilities. Lloyd’s exploits in Piute Pass seem, well, too easy.

Of course, An Eastern Westerner is funny. And there are several truly memorable moments, most notably an extended poker game gag. When Harold Lloyd transforms his appearance by removing his glasses, mussing his hair, and using his bow tie as a fake mustache… well, that’s comedy. But overall this short just seems very, very light, not only on substance by on laughs. I don’t think I would have made this observation a month ago, but having recently spent a week watching Buster Keaton shorts, I was reminded of just how substantive, hilarious, and innovative 20 minutes of movie can be.

Harold Lloyd Bow Tie Mustache

My chief complaint about An Eastern Westerner though is the absence of the Harold Lloyd that I expect, the Lloyd that I know and love. He’s not a hapless go-getter in this movie. He’s a spoiled rich kid, and it’s not a role that he wears well. In this short, “Glasses Guy” is too knowing, too suave, too assured – even when he loses. Here Lloyd isn’t forced to struggle for his ultimate success, he’s already successful if temporarily handicapped, and there’s little doubt that he’ll eventually return to his Manhattan mansion.

If you’re unfamiliar with Harold Lloyd and his superb feature films, skip An Eastern Westerner and start with one of the features (if you’re really unfamiliar, watch Safety Last immediately). If you are familiar with Lloyd go ahead and give An Eastern Westerner a view. It is funny, after all, especially that poker scene. It is availbale for viewing on YouTube, in three parts.

Advertisements

About prettycleverfilmgal

Social media consultant, blogger for hire, and lover of classic movies and silent films. I often watch, consider, and write about movies when I should really be doing other things.

Posted on June 28, 2011, in Comedy, Genre, My Reviews, Silent Film and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. I think what’s interesting about Lloyd, as compared to Chaplin and Keaton, is how long it took him to figure out what was funny. He started out doing “Lonesome Luke,” a pure Chaplin knock-off, and did that for about three years before putting on the glasses in 1917. But that was just the look. It took him another three or four years to figure out the character.

    Whereas, you look at Chaplin and he had figured out The Tramp within the first half dozen shorts he ever made, and Buster Keaton was practically fully formed from the word go.

    Somehow this makes Lloyd more accessible to my mind, like perhaps by sheer hard work alone, one can achieve greatness. That’s probably an illusion — Lloyd was clearly an extraordinary talent — but Chaplin and Keaton were so obviously working on some ethereal plane ordinary humans are not acquainted with that the aspiring artist can’t take much solace from them.

    • That’s a really excellent point about Lloyd. For me, it cuts to the heart of not only Harold Lloyd the artists, but also who that very funny character is. Lloyd’s everyman is a guy who works very hard to succeed. Not only is it funny and boot-strappingly American, it’s very relatable. And compared to Chaplin’s Tramp and Keaton’s Stoneface, Llyod’s “Glasses Guy” is much more grounded in reality.

  1. Pingback: Harold Lloyd TV Interview 1962 « Pretty Clever Films

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: